Will Democracy Prevail?

Due to massive losses, uncertainty, and loss of confidence, credit markets have seized up and it is becoming more difficult for banks to borrow from each other. Congress is working on putting together a purported $700 billion bailout package to assist firms that are in danger of collapse because they cannot find sources of capital to meet reserve requirements.

I will agree that the situation is poor, but I do not think it has yet reached cataclysmic proportions. Many say that the financial system is breaking down, but I say that it is a free market that is working just as it is supposed to. The cost of interbank borrowing has risen, but for good reason. If a bank wants to borrow from another to meet reserve requirements, but there is more risk than there is under normal circumstances, the lending bank needs compensation for that risk.

Unfortunately, the media has made the situation even worse. I believe that is a big reason why Washington Mutual has collapsed. People begin to panic that their bank is going to close its doors (even though more than likely, the deposits those people have are well below the FDIC insurable limits), so they take out all their money. When the deposits drop, the bank needs to increase reserves so it has to borrow. With the cost of borrowing high and sources of capital diminishing, it becomes impossible for the bank to maintain solvency. I think the media had a big effect on sending people to their branches to take out all their money and stuff it under their mattresses.

I was actually pleased to learn this morning that talks on the bailout package are breaking down. I believe that the vast majority of Americans do not want such a bailout to take place. Everyone I hear talking about this issue around the water cooler says they do not want it to happen. Let’s hope that Congress will lend an ear to constituents, and not pass legislation that will cost us for generations to come. A breakdown in the democracy in which this great nation was founded would be far worse than failure of the financial system.

Blog Traffic Exchange
Related Websites

  • Using a Home Equity Loan for an Emergency Fund
  • virtual bankingThe Downside To Online Banking
  • opportunity-knocksHow to Invest Now Without a Dime in the Bank
  • Related Posts:

  • Democracy Prevails – Round 1
  • Bailout Passes – Stock Markets Down
  • Improving Cash Flow vs. Accumulating Wealth

    When it comes to personal finance, most people are very familiar with the concept of cash flow. They know that their monthly pay represents cash flow in and checks written and automatic draft payments each month are cash flow out. As long as cash flow remains positive (the more positive the better), everything is great. However, most individuals do not realize that improving cash flow does not necessarily equate to improving overall savings and increasing one’s net worth. This is because interest expenses can reduce the accumulation of wealth, even though financing purchases (at higher interest rates) may improve cash flow.

    What exactly does that mean? Perhaps the easiest way to explain it and understand it is with a good example. Here’s an example inspired by a post David at MyTwoDollars made in which a reader asks whether to pay off a car loan or increase the down payment on a new home:

    My husband and I are selling our house and will be netting a profit of $52,000. We are building a $300,000 house and were wondering if we should pay off a Tahoe for $12,000 so we can get rid of a $600 payment or should we put all $52,000 into the new house. I guess I’m asking what the pros and cons would be. Thanks

    Unfortunately the reader did not include additional information necessary for my example, namely the interest rates on the car loan and mortgage. I will take the liberty of fabricating the interest rates and some other information. Here are the assumptions we will make for the first part of the example:

    • Auto loan balance: $12,000
    • Auto loan interest rate: 0%
    • Total monthly auto loan payment: $600
    • Auto loan total term: 36 months
    • Auto loan remaining term: 20 months
    • New home purchase price: $300,000
    • Down payment on home: $52,000
    • Amount borrowed for home purchase: $248,000
    • Interest rate on mortgage: 6%
    • Mortgage term: 30 years
    • Total monthly mortgage payment (principal and interest): $1,486.89
    • Auto loan is paid off and money is not used for down payment on home purchase
    • After auto loan payoff, monthly cash outflow is $1,486.89

    In order for my example to work, I had to make the rather outrageous assumption that the vehicle was purchased with 0% financing. So if the auto loan is paid off the monthly cash outflow will be $1,187.11. Now let’s see what happens if we keep making payments on the vehicle for the remaining 20 months, and use the $12,000 to increase the down payment on the new home:

    • New home purchase price: $300,000
    • Down payment on home: $64,000
    • Amount borrowed for home purchase: $236,000
    • Interest rate on mortgage: 6%
    • Mortgage term: 30 years
    • Total monthly mortgage payment (principal and interest): $1,414.94
    • Auto loan monthly payment: $600
    • Monthly cash outflow: $2,014.94

    Most people would tell you that paying off the car loan will help save $528.05 every month and over the course of 20 months would save a total of $10,561. However, I say that paying off the car loan will actually cost a total of $1,188.30 in terms of overall savings and accumulation of wealth. Certainly I will agree that cash flow will improve by $525.05 every month. However, by reducing the down payment on the new home by $12,000, it will actually cost more to pay off the car loan:

    • Total interest paid on a 30-yr. loan for $248,000 @ 6% over 20 months: $24,558.27
    • Total interest paid on a 30-yr. loan for $236,000 @ 6% over 20 months: $23,369.97
    • Difference: $1,188.30

    Keeping the car payment results in a higher net worth after 20 months, because the interest rate on the car payment is lower than that of the mortgage (now you see why I made my outrageous assumption of 0% financing on the vehicle). In terms of accumulating wealth, keeping the car payment is the more prudent decision. However, the majority of people would prefer to improve their monthly cash flow and pay off the vehicle. More often than not, individuals will sacrifice accumulating wealth in order to improve cash flow. Consequently this is the reason why most people never achieve financial independence.

    The bottom line: if you ever have the opportunity to pay down loan balances, you should pay balances with the higest interest rates first. You may be tempted to pay off the balance on a loan with a lower rate if the monthly payment is higher than the payment on a loan with a higher rate. Afterall, it would result in better cash flow to do so. However, it would not result in the most favorable net worth to pay off a lower rate balance first. Let’s look at another example with some smaller numbers:

    • You have a 36-month personal loan @ 10%
    • Monthly payment on personal loan is about $260.
    • Original personal loan amount was for $8,000.
    • Remaining balance on personal loan is about $3,000.
    • Remaining term on the personal loan is 12 months.
    • You have another credit card with a $5,600 balance @ 18%
    • Credit card has a monthly payment of $120.
    • Total monthly payment for both loans is $380.
    • You receive $4,000 for your annual bonus. Which balance do you pay off/pay down with the $4,000?

    I contend that most people would probably opt to pay off the personal loan, because it would result in a better cash flow improvement. However, paying down the credit card instead would result in a higher net worth. Let’s compare the difference in interest paid over the next 12 months (the remaining term of the personal loan):

      Paying Off Personal Loan Paying Down Credit Card*
    Personal Loan Interest Accumulated $0 $161.46
    Credit Card Interest Accumulated $969.82 $180.17
    Total Cost $969.82 $341.63
    Remaining Credit Card Balance $1,121.77 $249.48
    * – Although paying down the credit card balance would likely result in a lower minimum payment, assumption is made that the credit card payment is maintained at $120/mo. Even if the payments on the credit card are reduced after paying it down, the results would be similar and still result in a more favorable net worth.

    As you can see, by paying the lower interest balance first ends up costing more in the long run. Although cash flow improves over the next 12 months, you pay more in interest expenses and are left with a higher debt balance in month 13.  A higher debt balance means you have a lower net worth. Not only do you pay less interest in months 1-12, but you will pay less interest in subsequent months and debt will be eliminated faster.  So remember, if you can afford to do so, pay down your loans with the highest rates first.

    Blog Traffic Exchange
    Related Websites

  • garage-saleHow to Keep Cash Flow Coming In
  • Should I Use Savings to Pay Off Credit Card Debt?
  • Money Mistake Monday - The Affordable Monthly Payments Syndrome.
  • Related Posts:

  • Prosper Days 2008 Videos
  • Having Trouble Refinancing? Borrow from a Rich Friend or Family Member
  • Preparing to Refinance
  • Stock Exchanges Curtail Short Selling

    Yesterday the SEC and UK’s Financial Services Authority made very drastic moves by disallowing traders from shorting financial stocks.  Selling short is the practice of selling shares of securities that are not owned by the seller.  Shares are borrowed on margin, sold, and then purchased at a later date.  If the price is lower when the shares are repurchased, then the short seller makes a profit.  If the price is higher, the short seller suffers a loss.  I think that banning short selling on financial stocks is a really bad idea for two reasons:

    1. It will undoubtedly cause a short squeeze (as we began to see yesterday with the Dow rising 400 points). A short squeeze takes place when there is a lot of open short interest (a lot of people shorting a stock) and the stock begins to rise.  As the stock rises, many short sellers buy back the stock to prevent or cap their losses.  With many short sellers buying back the stock, it increases the demand for the stock and a snowball effect takes place as the stock skyrockets.  Many short sellers will receive margin calls and will either have to increase the value of the assets in their account or be forced to buy back short positions at a loss.
    2. It does absolutely nothing to solve the problems that are causing financial stocks to drop in the first place. Financial firms have seen their market value falling because of the difficulty they are facing in finding sources of capital.  The cost of borrowing for lenders and banks has increased due to the credit crunch.  Banning short selling on financial stocks does absolutely nothing to resolve the fundamental issues that have caused the market value of financial firms to fall.

    The action taken by the U.S. and U.K. regulatory agencies are likely to cause more problems than they will solve.  It will only increase the volatility in the stock market as a short squeeze takes place and after the ban is lifted.  After the ban is lifted, we will likely see the financial stocks drop once again.  Why?  Because the underlying issues still exist and the market will value the price of those financial institutions accordingly.  The day traders are going to really have a field day as they buy up shares of financial stocks and subsequently short them after the ban is lifted.

    Blog Traffic Exchange
    Related Websites

  • realmHow to Find the Most Valuable Coins for the Least Money
  • How does the Market Lose Value?
  • piggyStart Treating Your Finances Like a Bank
  • Related Posts:

  • Why Drilling Offshore is a Bad Idea
  • Receiving Dividends from Non-Dividend Stocks
  • Bailout Passes – Stock Markets Down
  • Evaporation of $4 Trillion in Under 1 Year

    The New York Times has a very interesting interactive graphic that depicts what has happened within the financial sector over the past year.  $4 trillion in market capitalization has been lost as the stock prices on financial firms have plummeted since last October.  I still believe that the worst is not yet behind us as the credit mess we are in continues to unravel.

    Before

    After

    Blog Traffic Exchange
    Related Websites

  • Kevin GillettFinovate Startup 2009 Live Twitter
  • Happy Financial New Year!
  • 10 Reasons Why Gold Should Break $1000 This Year
  • Related Posts:

  • Revolving Debt and the Economy
  • Weakening Economy Can Mean Good News for Homeowners
  • Making Your Maximum Annual IRA Contribution at Tax Time
  • Another Rate Cut Coming?

    In the wake of the turmoil in financial markets, the Federal Reserve met yesterday with representatives of the U.S. Treasury, financial services companies and state officials.  The Fed took steps to prevent a short-term cash crunch, as interbank rates jumped to more than triple the official rate.  They are also discussing measures to prevent a catastrophe from taking place at AIG, as the insurance company continues to try to shore up their balance sheet seeking sources of capital.

    In addition to AIG seeking to resolve its problems, things were much worse for Lehman Brothers who is seeking chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.  LEH fell over 90% to 20 cents yesterday.  The other top story of the day was Bank of America’s buyout of Merril Lynch in an all-stock deal.  Bank of America shares were down over 20%.  The fed will continue to meet today and  a decision is expected around 2:15.

    Through last week, there was no expectations of a rate cut.  However, yesterday sparked some hopes that the fed may decide to drop the federal funds rate to alleviate concerns surrounding the financial sector.  Interest rates may have to hit rock bottom to help those struggling to find capital.  I think that ultimately, the fed will have to allow some inflation to take place to help resolve many of the problems with credit and the economy.  If the fed doesn’t cut rates today, they may need to in the near future.  It has become exceedingly difficult for even large financial institutions to obtain capital, and without further reduction in interest rates these problems will continue.

    Blog Traffic Exchange
    Related Websites

  • Hong-Kong-StockAsian Stocks Fall on Europe Debt Concern; Canon, Banks Slump
  • Fed Rate Cut Lowers Savings Rates
  • U.S. Economy: Unemployment Rate Unexpectedly Declines to 9.7%Jobless rate falls to 9.7 percent in January
  • Related Posts:

  • $15 Produce Shopping List
  • Weakening Economy Can Mean Good News for Homeowners
  • Having Trouble Refinancing? Borrow from a Rich Friend or Family Member